
Legal wants an AI policy assistant. Sales wants an AI pitch writer. The CFO wants 27% revenue growth with 20% fewer heads. Here is how I’m helping product leaders turn that chaos into an outcome story the board can trust.
Planning season is here. You are being asked for bigger growth, fewer resources, and a crisp AI plan. SaaS multiples have been hammered, and every executive in the room has the same questions: How do we become AI native, reduce workforce needs, and still grow like last year?
I’m hearing CEOs, CFOs, COOs, and CIOs ask for AI to cut costs and for technology to fuel another 25–27% revenue climb. Meanwhile, every department is throwing AI requests over the wall. The backlog is filling with ideas that drift away from your core product. That is why this year feels different. The pressure is up, the noise is up, and the margin for fuzzy answers is gone.
Most leadership teams are measured on revenue and EBITDA. That is the scoreboard. Yet many product teams cannot directly connect their work to those outcomes. I keep finding the same gap: there is a corporate scorecard at the exec level, and the product org has never seen it. No linkage from JIRA to the metrics that run the business. No shared definition of success.
The result is predictable. Roadmaps bend toward whoever yells loudest. AI becomes a list of features, not a strategy. And when headcount pressure hits, product leaders are forced to defend output rather than impact. We can fix that.
The outcome conversation is not new, but it is non-negotiable now. Your job is to bridge engineering and the business. That means translating sprints into revenue, retention, and cost metrics leadership cares about. It means asking simple questions when AI ideas appear: Which business metric does this move, by how much, and how will we measure it?
Great organizations connect the boardroom to the backlog. They tie initiatives to clear, verifiable impact. If you want a quick primer on making that leap, I wrote about it in moving from velocity to value and in the real challenge of tracking outcomes.
Every department wants AI yesterday. That is normal. Tools like Intercom’s Fin and Zendesk’s Answer Bot show how AI can cut support costs and improve experience when used well. For a concise overview of where AI is truly reshaping SaaS product, operations, and pricing, this guide is solid: How AI is transforming B2B SaaS.
On the revenue side, leaders are monetizing AI through tiered or usage-based pricing models. GitHub Copilot is a common example, and firms like Simon-Kucher outline the playbook in Key Growth Levers for SaaS in 2025. The message is clear. If AI does not move acquisition, expansion, retention, or gross margin, it is noise.
Start here. Find the executive scorecard. Know the owner. Understand the definitions. If it is revenue, EBITDA, NRR, churn, or gross margin, make those targets the north star for your roadmap.
Then wire the execution layer into that view. Map initiatives and epics in JIRA to the scorecard metrics they are meant to move. Add the measurement plan up front. If an initiative cannot be traced to a score, it is a candidate to defer or sunset. More on lifecycle discipline in navigating the product life cycle.
This will feel uncomfortable at first. You will ask harder questions. You will say no more often. You will replace feature theater with outcome math. But this is how real product leadership looks when markets tighten and AI expectations spike.
At Iteright, we obsess over connecting work to measurable business outcomes. If that is your mindset too, explore our approach at Iteright and how we help teams link execution to impact in our solutions. Keep it practical, keep it measurable, and keep it tied to the scorecard.
You sit in the middle seat between technology and the board. Own that seat. Ask for the scorecard. Tie the roadmap to it. Ship proof. Measure what matters. Then go back to the table and show, plainly, how the work moved the number.